Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 10:15:24 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: babkin@hq.icb.chel.su (Serge A. Babkin) Cc: dyson@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: EDO & Memory latency Message-ID: <199605161715.KAA17388@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199605160907.PAA10321@hq.icb.chel.su> from "Serge A. Babkin" at May 16, 96 03:07:44 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The processor's internal conveyer size is at most 5 (?) > steps, for 13ns cycle this give 65ns for the maximal processor overhead. > The memory refresh can add about 15% of overhead, 60ns*0.15=9ns. In sum we > get 80+40+65+9=~=295ns. But the remaining 200ns are a real mystery for me. Yeah, that's my ~280 number. (ugh. I just relaized I labelled the units in my last post as uS). 400 - 295 = 105, so there's about half of your mystery for you. 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605161715.KAA17388>