Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 5 May 2001 14:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Rfork'd threads, signals, and LDTs
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010505143128.15821A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <15092.6577.733823.946525@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> 
> Daniel Eischen writes:
>  > 
>  > OK, thanks.  Here's my guess at what should be changed for the Linux
>  > emulator.  If this looks correct, I'll commit it.
>  > 
>  > Hmm, I wonder how linuxthreads works under FreeBSD without this
>  > change...
>  > 
> 
> This breaks at least one version of the IBM JDK that I have
> laying around..  
> 
> If anything, we may have two errors (at least partially) canceling
> each other out. I think it needs more work/thought prior to
> committing.

We're still OK with the change to FreeBSDs native signal trampoline
though, right?  I'll hold off on the Linux emulator changes until
we can figure out what the problem is.

-- 
Dan Eischen

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1010505143128.15821A-100000>