Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 11:29:16 -0500 From: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> To: Michael Schuster <michael.schuster@sun.com> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: why would Sparc be soo sloow?] Message-ID: <20021209112915.J65438@locore.ca> In-Reply-To: <3DF4ADA4.77830BDB@sun.com>; from michael.schuster@sun.com on Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:50:12PM %2B0100 References: <3DF4ADA4.77830BDB@sun.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Apparently, On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 03:50:12PM +0100, Michael Schuster said words to the effect of; > I wrote: > > > > Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > > > > > > > = - other HW config aspects, like storage in use, etc for both (!) > > > = machines, as well as characteristic of the application, such > > > = as > > > = - memory footprint > > > = - I/O behaviour, etc. > > > > > > Very little -- all the program is doing is computations -- the CPU is > > > the bottleneck on both machines. > > > > if this really is the case, patch 111722-01 may help you. > > a few tests showed that that's likely. > [...] This all great, but discussing problems with solaris is terribly off topic here. On topic would be perhaps helping us to get the things we need to support UltraSPARC III on FreeBSD and comparing that to the dell. Please stay on topic. Jake To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021209112915.J65438>