Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 20 Jan 1995 14:39:08 -0700
From:      Nate Williams <nate@sneezy.sri.com>
To:        "bo (b.) xiao" <xiao@bnr.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@wcarchive.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: fw:how does one get perl for 2.0?
Message-ID:  <9501202139.AA13924@rocky.MT.net.mt.net>
In-Reply-To: "bo (b.) xiao" <xiao@bnr.ca> "Re: fw:how does one get perl for 2.0?" (Jan 20, 10:41am)

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message "how does one get perl for 2.0?", nate@sneezy.sri.com writes:
> > The reason Perl5 isn't in the release is because it was 'beta' software
> > when the release was being put together.  Also, it has been my
> > experience that it is a best to wait for a couple patches to be released
> > before using a new product since there are always bugs that need to be
> > shaken out in the initial distribution.

> Drawback is some newer package requires newer perl. Majordomo for
> one refuses to work with the bundled perl. It complains something
> about time, as said in its readme or so. Freefall uses an older 
> majordomo(1.63) so perl4 is fine(my guess).

Really?  The version of majordomo must have been release fairly recently (~
2 months), since I got it and was going to upgrade it on freefall then.

If someone wants to make it into a port, I'm sure we would be willing to
accept it. :-)


Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9501202139.AA13924>