Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:37:39 +0600 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru> To: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: carp regression in 9.1 ? Message-ID: <51469A13.7090503@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG1_1hQgpmjAMTerQBqdXUK8fnAx=k81GKN0wmZ6KZAt5Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <3B04FCB1-D0D4-4BC9-BB15-5221F438738C@my.gd> <514594D7.1020202@norma.perm.ru> <CAPBZQG1_1hQgpmjAMTerQBqdXUK8fnAx=k81GKN0wmZ6KZAt5Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi. On 17.03.2013 21:20, Ermal Luçi wrote: > > From this aspects carp in 10(HEAD) should behave the same since the > internals of carp have not been changed only the iconnection with the > FreeBSD stack has. > Talking about aliases on carp that used to be a bit broken up-to 9.x > they do not exist at all in 10. > Which needs a bit of discussion per se how to solve. > > Yup, but the same behaviour can be achieved in 10.x with two ways: - one address == one vhid (when a machine needs to neighbour with carp on 8.x this requires configuration changes on 8.x). - multiple addresses == one vhid, in the same order the addresses appear on the neighbor, regardless of the version. I tried both ways and they both work. Eugene.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51469A13.7090503>