Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Dec 2011 23:49:46 +0200
From:      =?utf-8?B?0JrQvtC90YzQutC+0LIg0JXQstCz0LXQvdC40Lk=?= <kes-kes@yandex.ru>
To:        Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: msi-x, net.isr, polling
Message-ID:  <738696479.20111223234946@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogaPnkn4v8raKQnYa-BptxcmFmdGLoOagGP_O-nr7Eoe=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAEW%2BogaPnkn4v8raKQnYa-BptxcmFmdGLoOagGP_O-nr7Eoe=Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
SH> Hi everyone,

SH> I see reference to options: net.isr, msi-x, polling specially in ter,s of
SH> tuning and performance namely for packet processing/drops.

SH> I've searced (google, wiki and so on...) and I'm confused about these
SH> options and concerned about them since I'm working on routing and
SH> performance issues based on FreeBSD.

SH> can someone give light and detailed explanation about theseoptions,when
SH> should/shouldn't be used?

SH> Thanks in advance,

SH> Merry Christmas,

very good guide is here:
https://calomel.org/network_performance.html

polling is old. msi-x now give more better performance. see
descriptions in source code.


Eugen.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?738696479.20111223234946>