Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 16:16:20 +0300 From: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <spam@rm-rf.kiev.ua>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(16384): kmem_map too small: md-mounted /tmp filled up Message-ID: <20070306131620.GA88463@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: <200703051314.29902@aldan> References: <20070227205351.GA72597@ravenloft.kiev.ua> <20070305035945.GA71660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070305132350.GB57253@comp.chem.msu.su> <200703051314.29902@aldan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 01:14:29PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On Monday 05 March 2007 08:23, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > = > How will it break them? šswap backing only touches swap if there is > = > memory pressure, i.e. precisely the situation in which malloc backing > = > will panic. > = > = I forgot that in BSD swap wouldn't be allocated in advance to its > = consumers. šThen removing the -M flag and making swap backing the > = default is a very sound choice. šThank you for correcting me. > > Yar, would you change the man-page's advice and the default, then? Done in CURRENT. I'll MFC it in a week. -- Yar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070306131620.GA88463>