Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 20:40:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@webwarrior.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/41787: man page for route (Section 8) missing definition for -d Message-ID: <200208210340.g7L3e6oH066365@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/41787; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@webwarrior.net> To: bug-followup@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/41787: man page for route (Section 8) missing definition for -d Date: 20 Aug 2002 22:33:46 +0000 > > >How-To-Repeat: > > man 8 route > > >Fix: > > Add description for -d (Delete ?) > > >Release-Note: > > >Audit-Trail: > > >Unformatted: > > > > I'll take a gander at this. I quick perusal of route.c has me thinking > it's a debug or verbose switch. Have to do a bit more research though. > > josh I emailed ume@freebsd.org which according to the cvs records is the person who has committed the last several changes to route.c The -d switch is definitely the debug switch, but what it actually does is beyond my ken. Josh To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208210340.g7L3e6oH066365>