Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 20:36:20 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Possibility? Message-ID: <11700.846128180@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Oct 1996 14:16:51 PDT." <199610232116.OAA10473@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I think the core team sets direction and policy, as well as > self-sechduling core team members as engineering resources, doesn't it? The core team members largely self-schedule themselves, more according to whatever available time and energy resources are available that week than any quickly-obsolete "master plan", but if one wanted to back-solve from this and call the sum of their decisions "core team policy" then yeah, I guess you could do that too. ;-) Jordan P.S. Of course this isn't ISO 9000 compliant management, but then about 95% of the existing core team would probably walk if it were, so the medicine would be worse than the cure.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11700.846128180>