Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:13:08 -0400 From: Antoine Beaupre <anarcat@anarcat.ath.cx> To: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com> Cc: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>, Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk>, stijn@win.tue.nl, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: code freeze Message-ID: <440BE86A-7D6F-11D6-AF4B-0050E4A0BB3F@anarcat.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <15622.8128.314656.873511@chlx255.ch.intel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le mardi 11 juin 2002, =E0 12:05 PM, John Reynolds~ a =E9crit : > > [ On Tuesday, June 11, Michael Lucas wrote: ] >> >> Allow me to recommend "make package" instead of "make install" when = in >> the port directory. >> >> Compile it exactly the way you want, and build it as a package. Then >> you can nfs-mount the package dir, and even have a shell script run >> "pkg_add" on your new machines. >> >> All the advantages of packages, and none of the disadvantages. > > Indeed you can do that, or if you're looking for a slightly = cheese-ball=20 > (but > works) method, you can build and install the port and then manually=20 > delete the > > work/.install_done.<portname>-<portversion> > > file. Then if your /usr/ports is mounted on another machine you can=20 > simply > type "make install" again. "make reinstall" bypasses .install_done files, IIRC. A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?440BE86A-7D6F-11D6-AF4B-0050E4A0BB3F>