Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 11:11:08 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP Message-ID: <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com> References: <CAJxePNJcTh0QZfr_YOLwN-R1nOrdJETxgMPPm78S35MAsipsug@mail.gmail.com> <aef8c5199b6d01d3fc5d21ac120574a7.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> <CAJxePN%2BGKorAeHCh0HRfUqwAOJ-x%2B_xtPiHk_XDuRAmJWYdgoQ@mail.gmail.com> <BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: > On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: >> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? > The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the precompiled package you got used. While many people want PHP in the form of an Apache module, other folks use it via fastcgi and so forth... Yes that might be so. But it's far better to *have* this module and disable it in Apache than not have it at all and for that reason only *buiild* apache from ports in stead of using a package.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0C0EBC.3010401>