Date: Tue, 20 Jan 1998 18:45:26 +0300 (MSK) From: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports system possible fixups list (PLEASE READ) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980120183643.25623A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> In-Reply-To: <199801201324.QAA01368@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Jan 1998, Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
> > Anything else?
>
> 4) Put POSIXLY_CORRECT=yes to environment before call patch in bsd.port.mk.
It not works as you suppose, from patch(1)
o For the purpose of the following rules, the names are
considered to be in the order (old, new, index),
regardless of the order that they appear in the header.
o If some of the named files exist, patch uses the first
name if the POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable is
set, and the best name otherwise.
I.e. even if POSIXLY_CORRECT is set and Index: line counted, the order
will be (old, new, index) and _never_ (index, old, new). You can write
_anything_ in Index: line, if "old" exists, it will be taken.
> 5) Make new patch POSIX compliant by default.
There is no backups in POSIX mode, moreover it leads to incompatibility
with other systems which have patch 2.5.
> It is all about current. There is no big problem (and may be, no problem at
> all) under 2.2-stable.
I think so too excepting 3 ports which need to be fixed:
modula-3-socks, virtualpager, rdist6
--
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nietzsche.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980120183643.25623A-100000>