Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 13:52:30 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> Subject: Re: [Solicite review for KAME 10th patch] Message-ID: <200001141852.NAA14374@alsatian.cslab.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000113205438.C20217@lucifer.bart.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13-Jan-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: >>And I did it again, >>I added a new function realhostname2() which is protocol >>independent version of realhostname(), in libutil. >> >>If someone think these naming style should be changed, I think >>it is best timing now. Please give me some proposal. >>e.g. >> bindresvport_sa() >> realhostname_sa() > > I really prefer the _sa versions because the naming is less ambiguous > from the 2 appended versions. I also prefer the *_sa names to the *2 names. > I wonder what the others think. Has this been standardised somewhere > already or are we now still in a phase, do what you want and after that > we'll make a IPv6 API standard? I also second this, i.e. if there is a standard API we should be following that, but I suppose that it there was a standard you would already be following it. :) -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001141852.NAA14374>