Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 21 May 1999 07:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Bill Woods <wwoods@cybcon.com>
To:        Dennis Ostrovsky <denis.ostrovsky@yale.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: egcs....
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSI.4.05L.9905210758180.22615-100000@pdx.cybcon.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9905211047580.26295-100000@mercury.cis.yale.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm.....has this been verified on the new 3.2 release? If this is the
case, I will stick with gcc, as I have no desire to go 4.0-current right
now opn this system

Bill

On Fri, 21 May 1999, Dennis Ostrovsky wrote:

> On Fri, 21 May 1999, Bill Woods wrote:
> 
> > I was toying with the idea of using the egcs in the ports (1.1.2 I
> > believe) on my 3.2 system. Anyone useing egcs for everyday compiliong and
> > anyone compiled the kernel with it. What are your observations?
> > problems...and is it just a bad idea or does it work well.
> 
> I was under the impression that egcs would not compile the kernel properly
> under 3.x, although it does work (I think) for the 4.0-CURRENT tree.
> 
> Dennis
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Dennis Ostrovsky ** Department of Chemistry ** Yale University  
> 
> E-mail: den@master.chem.yale.edu     WWW: http://pantheon.yale.edu/~do33     
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.4.05L.9905210758180.22615-100000>