Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 14:59:29 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org> To: Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Entities for some instances (was: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq book.sgml) Message-ID: <20020821115929.GB81256@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <200208131114.g7DBEjVW065709@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200208131114.g7DBEjVW065709@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-08-13 04:14 +0000, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > Log: > Explain how a partition can be more than 100% full. > While I'm there: > -stable/-STABLE, Windows-95 and Windows95 --> Windows 95 > Revision Changes Path > 1.463 +26 -3 doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml I'd probably prefer &ms.win.95; that expands to something like: Microsoft Windows 95 and similar entities that ensure that when our documents are typeset and beautifuly printed on paper, there is absolutely *no* chance of something like this appearing on paper (depending on existing margins and paper size, of course): ... Microsoft Windows 95 ... The &ms.*; entities could also include stuff like: &ms.dos.6; &ms.office.97; But I'm very skeptical about introducing entities for stuff like this. The main intention would be to make it easier to type consistently something that looks prettier than "foo bar" and is not as hard to remember. Does this sound crazy to anyone? - Giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020821115929.GB81256>