Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 17:07:10 +0200 From: Marko Kuntic <mkuntic@mioc.hr> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: bin/54185: UFS2 filesystem ACL flag not enforced Message-ID: <E19ZXaA-0009fe-Ux@zagreb.mioc.hr> Resent-Message-ID: <200307071510.h67FABud012363@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 54185 >Category: bin >Synopsis: UFS2 filesystem ACL flag not enforced >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 07 08:10:11 PDT 2003 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Marko Kuntic >Release: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE i386 >Organization: XV. gimnazija, Zagreb, Croatia >Environment: System: FreeBSD zagreb.mioc.hr 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Wed Jun 18 10:46:35 CEST 2003 root@zagreb.mioc.hr:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZAGREB i386 >Description: Whether the ACL enable flag is set on a UFS2 filesystem or not, ACLs are not enabled unless explicitly set in /etc/fstab or specified upon manual mounting. >How-To-Repeat: umount <some_ufs2_slice> tunefs -a enable <some_ufs2_slice> mount <some_ufs2_slice> The filesystem will not, as it should, have ACLs enabled. >Fix: Explicitly specifying the acls mount option. But what's the point of having the superblock flag then? >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E19ZXaA-0009fe-Ux>