Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 18:38:00 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Kris Moore <piett134@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about x64 and running x86 programs Message-ID: <20051111233800.GA16215@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <43750645.1040906@gmail.com> References: <43743466.2050909@gmail.com> <43743CC5.9070801@freebsd.org> <200511111131.36948.peter@wemm.org> <20051111200558.GA64077@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20051111202334.GA64218@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <43750645.1040906@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:59:49PM -0800, Kris Moore wrote: >=20 > Figured I'd give you guys an update on this also. I got all the=20 > libraries loaded, and everything into place, but it seems the suppot is= =20 > only "so-so" at best. About every other binary crashes, or segfaults=20 > with varying errors. I have quite a few QT programs, and they are all=20 > compiled on the same machine, with the same libs and such, but its=20 > really hit-n-miss on which ones work. Anybody know if the 32bit binary /= =20 > shared library support is really still this shaky? It's a work-in-progress, and you're doing something pretty extreme with it.. Kris --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDdStYWry0BWjoQKURArTZAKCnd4wM1KpB1mYJpqUkIOm1zDvX5ACcCYje qo5nnC6/nT8FMF9EU/RjXPI= =1BIT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051111233800.GA16215>