Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 10:23:56 GMT From: Peter <peter@vereshagin.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/119413: Double port/naming inconsistence Message-ID: <200801071023.m07ANuQI010377@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200801071030.m07AU1CP033873@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 119413 >Category: ports >Synopsis: Double port/naming inconsistence >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: change-request >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 07 10:30:01 UTC 2008 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Peter >Release: 5.4-STABLE #13 >Organization: Private >Environment: FreeBSD screwed.box 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #13: Thu Oct 19 10:13:53 SAMST 2006 toor@screwed.box:/usr/local/src/sys/i386/compile/OPER i386 >Description: I submitted the port, the www/p5-FCGI-ProcManager. But there already exists the www/p5-FastCGI-ProcManager. Think we need to avoid such misunderstandings cause there exist the www/p5-FCGI-Async. I simply did not found the p5-FastCGI-ProcManager cause i was looking index for p5-FCGI, for the FCGI perl namespace. So i do submit the www/p5-FCGI-Spawn next, but: a. need to know what port to depend on, the p5-FCGI-ProcManager or p5-FastCGI-ProcManager b. need the common naming convention to name the port p5-FCGI-Spawn or the p5-FastCGI-Spawn. >How-To-Repeat: make search ProcManager >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801071023.m07ANuQI010377>