Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 21:18:17 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Carl Shapiro <carl.shapiro@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: binary compatibility query Message-ID: <481F5D79.4030203@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4dcb5abd0805051132o77d68e36u3f0ad38630a02afd@mail.gmail.com> References: <4dcb5abd0805050540m292b319aw52aa2cb8ba018e12@mail.gmail.com> <481F0DB3.9070505@FreeBSD.org> <481F48EE.3050806@elischer.org> <481F4EED.2030300@FreeBSD.org> <4dcb5abd0805051132o77d68e36u3f0ad38630a02afd@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Carl Shapiro wrote: > If my binary only executes system calls indirectly through libc > interfaces, as far as libc and libm are concerned, are new symbols the > only thing I need to worry about? I think so, yes. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?481F5D79.4030203>