Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:30:03 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@tumbolia.com> To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Cc: <current@FreeBSD.ORG>, <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, <mckusick@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: background fsck Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105172227120.38762-100000@shell-2.enteract.com> In-Reply-To: <200105172206.f4HM6Bk85261@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 May 2001, David Wolfskill wrote: :>From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> : :>Hmm, that's odd, I did have soft updates on on /usr and /var before the crash. :>It seems to be off now. :( : :That also happened to me. I thought it odd at the time, but forgot to :mention it.... At least I have some reason to believe I was unlikely to :have been hallucinating about that.... Does tunefs update the alternate superblocks when it enables soft updates? It doesn't look it does, but I might be missing something. -- dscheidt@tumbolia.com Bipedalism is only a fad. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105172227120.38762-100000>