Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 17:16:06 +0100 From: Michael Schuster <michael.schuster@sun.com> To: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca> Cc: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Fwd: why would Sparc be soo sloow?] Message-ID: <3DF4C1C6.EE41D5B4@sun.com> References: <3DF4ADA4.77830BDB@sun.com> <20021209112915.J65438@locore.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jake Burkholder wrote: > > > This all great, but discussing problems with solaris is terribly off topic > here. On topic would be perhaps helping us to get the things we need to > support UltraSPARC III on FreeBSD and comparing that to the dell. I got carried away, sorry. the patch I mentioned fixes a bug in the treatment of NaNs in libm. Since Mikhail mentioned "Suns compiler", I reasoned he was talking about Solaris, which he is, I guess. thx for the reality check. Michael Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DF4C1C6.EE41D5B4>