Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:25:54 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: etcupdate tool in base?
Message-ID:  <4C114A52.2060405@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C112C6C.50000@elischer.org>
References:  <201006101346.59824.jhb@freebsd.org> <4C112C6C.50000@elischer.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 06/10/10 11:18, Julian Elischer wrote:
| It does bring up the question (yet again) if we shouldn't
| have something that is between base and ports..
| the keep base from bloating too much bit to still indicate
| that they are supported.

Julian,

This statement perpetuates the idea that somehow anything in ports is
"lesser" than things that are in src, which frankly I'm way past being
sick of. The ports tree is part of FreeBSD, period. If you don't believe
me, try installing just the base without installing any ports, and then
see how much work you're able to get done.


Doug

- -- 

	... and that's just a little bit of history repeating.
			-- Propellerheads

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJMEUpSAAoJEFzGhvEaGryE7DMIALLAQ3oituvWpboIVi3kqkU/
G4jH4tmasyOaWXqP5qH/xtcJDFfbNEKORlDrJem8q0XKluXaw8jZKW+8dgsdBAqJ
IcGVfIOWDXID4ZdMAU1wvLiqB3Ozkt0RnOnrgR+lAbstTZlX886HUpPFU0AyNJj3
EQKOIwk2SVAa5Y6lF+NPf/+M56RSnzezgU2QVGYdbnjOLqsl91SEYgBAYQN50sqi
meIWJeL3iGuZ0krkkwQ3/zFlKsq5o/x76pClv+yqevVdo/EIRvaG0AfcGEPwXMdO
RdN1sMkl8E+2IVpr2ruIwjN8JtAqzkC/6EhOZcvsXheeoKQLgwR4D0O58uvEUPs=
=XzyJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4C114A52.2060405>