Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:12:52 +0100 From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> To: Eric Masson <emss@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages Message-ID: <4F0C2B44.7050408@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <8662gjrdqd.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> References: <CAJxePN%2BWrr6K83RGFGERzJGUXc24i95BemPOgxqAJW_2Lsfjpg@mail.gmail.com> <07e401cccefb$364338b0$a2c9aa10$@fisglobal.com> <CAHieY7RL5wf=Tk7-9KafudTFYbTHtXh9Ap9rDyVCM=5qEFN4ew@mail.gmail.com> <083a01cccf07$79fd35e0$6df7a1a0$@fisglobal.com> <CAJxePNKkFGbfcvUV=SPSV8PiQ4aqpc54fYOCLb6kbn_R84xqrw@mail.gmail.com> <4F0C0EFC.401@nagual.nl> <8662gjrdqd.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef: > Dick Hoogendijk<dick@nagual.nl> writes: > > Hi, > >> As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo. > *You* think it's stupid. Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo" But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's better to *have* the pache module and disable it than to *have to* use ports just to get it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F0C2B44.7050408>