Date: 21 Mar 2001 15:29:52 -0500 From: Don Croyle <croyle@gelemna.org> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, "Michael C . Wu" <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG, thinker@branda.to Subject: Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2] Message-ID: <86snk6g91b.fsf@emerson.gelemna.org> In-Reply-To: "Andrey A. Chernov"'s message of "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:27:39 %2B0300" References: <20010319195438.A43266@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320002043.A46115@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320065321.E63933668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <20010320005919.B46871@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320073058.D26883668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <20010320171736.L22505@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010321035805.C743F3668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <20010321152738.B12397@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> writes: > I fully agree. wctype.h and isw*() must be implemented first instead of > hacking or using private interface (like runes) in userland program. > It will be easy to implement them over existen ctype mechanism masking > runes with wchar_t. Any takers? If we're not going to bring in CITRUS, I'd prefer to see runes junked as an unnecessary layer of abstraction. Doing so would break backwards compatibility for locales, but I think we're going to end up doing that eventually anyway. -- I've always wanted to be a dilettante, but I've never quite been ready to make the commitment. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86snk6g91b.fsf>