Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jun 2002 20:13:51 +0100
From:      Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>, ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely5.cicely.de
Cc:        alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Wither the nexus driver?
Message-ID:  <200206242013.51504.dfr@nlsystems.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020623.215604.44113855.imp@village.org>
References:  <20020623.172213.49286833.imp@village.org> <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de> <20020623.215604.44113855.imp@village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 24 June 2002 4:56 am, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20020623233355.GE53233@cicely5.cicely.de>
>
>             Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely5.cicely.de> writes:
> : root node is the chipset:
> : [67]cicely9# devinfo
> : cia0
>
> OK.  Is cia the only chipset, or are there others?

I guess you are asking this question to decide where to put the implement=
ation=20
of child_present? Why not put it in root0? That way you don't have to tou=
ch=20
all the MD drivers at all.

--=20
Doug Rabson=09=09=09=09Mail:  dfr@nlsystems.com
=09=09=09=09=09Phone: +44 20 8348 6160


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206242013.51504.dfr>