Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:31:50 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: david@catwhisker.org, dscheidt@tumbolia.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, mckusick@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: background fsck Message-ID: <200105180531.f4I5VoI86453@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0105172227120.38762-100000@shell-2.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 22:30:03 -0500 (CDT) >From: David Scheidt <dscheidt@tumbolia.com> >Does tunefs update the alternate superblocks when it enables soft updates? >It doesn't look it does, but I might be missing something. I could easily have overlooked something myself, but it doesn't appear to do so to me. (I see it does want the file system clean when soft updates is enabled, but doesn't check for that for a disable request.) Cheers, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org As a computing professional, I believe it would be unethical for me to advise, recommend, or support the use (save possibly for personal amusement) of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105180531.f4I5VoI86453>