Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 17:57:58 -0500 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Doubt of system(3) Message-ID: <20011002175758.M59854@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20011002220152.A3056@gattaca.yadt.co.uk>; from davidt@yadt.co.uk on Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:01:52PM %2B0100 References: <200109291527.f8TFRrU76727.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20010929153433.U59854@elvis.mu.org> <20010929214338.A57903@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> <20010929221658.B57903@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> <20010929170332.Y59854@elvis.mu.org> <20010929232839.A91153@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> <20011002130942.C704@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20011002112707.C59854@elvis.mu.org> <20011002220152.A3056@gattaca.yadt.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk> [011002 16:02] wrote: > On Tue, 02 Oct 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > * Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> [011002 05:21] wrote: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 11:28:39PM +0100, David Taylor wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > IMO, the below patch is probably the best solution. > > > > > > Yep, it also fixes the fact that the return value from wait4() needs > > > to be preserved, at least for the return statement of __system(). > > > > Aaaaaaaaaaah! Forgot about it, I'm going to upgrade my workstation > > now and commit it if it works, probably tonight. > > > > If someone else can test it earlier, by all means commit it. > > Just to say that as I did a make world today, I took the opportunity to test > the patch, and it does fix the bug. Thanks for taking the time to do this and thanks for the feedback. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011002175758.M59854>