Date: 28 Mar 2000 12:59:32 -0600 From: Soren Dayton <dayton@overx.com> To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? Message-ID: <86hfdqly3v.fsf@polo.overx.com> In-Reply-To: Kenneth W Cochran's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 13:05:29 -0500 (EST)" References: <20000328113633.A28085@cons.org> <002301bf98dc$79ed86e0$0100000a@vista1.sdca.home.com> <200003281805.NAA05866@world.std.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com> writes: > >From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 28 12:42:40 2000 > >From: Soren Dayton <dayton@overx.com> > >Subject: Re: Let 3.x die ASAP? > >Date: 28 Mar 2000 11:35:42 -0600 > > > >Is there a good list of improvements? In particular details of > >the NFS improvements? I tried looking through the CVS logs, but > >it was not immediately clear to me. And doing that for the > >entire source tree doesn't seem very efficient. > > > >Thanks, > >Soren > > Perhaps src/UPDATING? There is a reverse chronological history > log there... errrr. For _updating_, not generally. Nor specifically. The notes on the website seem like a reasonable approximation of what I'm looking for. (except the NFS details). Thanks everybody! Soren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hfdqly3v.fsf>