Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 16:44:34 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@phone.net> Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ldconfig finding libraries, but ld is not. Message-ID: <19991112164434.C69871@relay.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <14379.28319.927705.778764@guru.phone.net> References: <14378.28246.28493.440833@guru.phone.net> <199911112213.RAA34417@server.baldwin.cx> <14379.17630.340446.163663@guru.phone.net> <19991111144938.B69565@pinky.plambert.net> <14379.28319.927705.778764@guru.phone.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 05:34:23PM -0800, Mike Meyer wrote: > Except, of course, that /usr/local/lib *does* get special treatment! > It's listed in ldconfig_paths (and the aout subdir > ldconfig_paths_aout), along with /usr/X11R6/lib & > /usr/lib/compat. None of those are part of the OS, though all are part > of the distribution. > This seems a tad inconsistent. We make sure that the person installing Yes, but ldconfig_paths is in the rc.conf configuration file. -L paths are hardcoded and compiled into GCC and friends. The user can change ldconfig_paths as they need to. There isn't an easy way for them to change the auto -L list. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991112164434.C69871>