Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Nov 1997 13:46:14 -0500 (EST)
From:      spork <spork@super-g.com>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: /etc/*.conf file for daily/weekly/security etc maintenance 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971104134344.11919A-100000@super-g.inch.com>
In-Reply-To: <199711040448.PAA01232@word.smith.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm not sure if you folks have seen this, but NetBSD has something like
this for daily/weekly/monthly:

#       $NetBSD: daily.conf,v 1.2 1997/01/20 06:08:36 mycroft Exp $
#
# see daily.conf(5) for more information.

find_core=NO
expire_news=NO
purge_accounting=YES
run_msgs=NO
run_calendar=NO
check_uucp=NO
check_disks=YES
check_mailq=NO
check_network=YES
run_fsck=NO
run_rdist=NO
run_security=YES

It shouldn't matter too much where you put it, just so everything is
all in one place...  IMO, the NetBSD way is a bit messy as it adds three
more files to an already-crowded /etc.

Charles

On Tue, 4 Nov 1997, Mike Smith wrote:

> > > 
> > > Just propose your extensions to rc.conf; everything should be in there.
> > 
> > I thought about it, but is it appropriate?  rc.conf is for startup things,
> > no?  regular maintenance.. *shrug*
> 
> rc.conf is for general parametric information; whether it be startup or 
> periodic.  Things like the named flags etc. are consumed by the named.* 
> scripts and so forth.
> 
> Unless there's a _really_ compelling reason, rc.conf is the way to go.
> 
> mike
> 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971104134344.11919A-100000>