Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Aug 2007 15:14:38 +0400
From:      Denis Barov <dindin@dindin.ru>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vlan taggging on etherchannel
Message-ID:  <20070821111438.GC1538@alpha.tbt.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20070821113922.B40614@mignon.ki.iif.hu>
References:  <20070821113922.B40614@mignon.ki.iif.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue Aug 21, 2007 at 11:53:36 +0200, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> Dear All,
> 	What is the recommended way to configure vlan interfaces on etherchannel=
 bonded interfaces in=20
> a failure mode. I found, that etherchannel is supported by ng_fec(4) (but=
 not exactly what I=20
> want) and also found that there two? way of configuring vlans: vlan(4) an=
d ng_vlan(4). But I=20
> did not found any description or configuration snippet to configure both =
preferentially via=20
> /etc/rc.conf neither in FreeBSD 6.x-stable, neither in FreeBSD-7.0-curren=
t. What I want to=20
> achieve:
>=20
>   [switch1]-----GE---bge0----\    /----vlan100
>                               }=3D=3D{-----vlan101
>   [switch2]-----FE---bge1----/    \----vlan102
>                                    \---vlan103
>=20
>=20
> I would like to  prefer all the vlans via bge0 with GE towards switch1. A=
nd use only bge1 in=20
> case of switch1 or bge0 link failure.
>=20
> I could use bond on Linux for this purpose. How to achieve similar setup?
>=20
> Best Regards,
>=20
> Janos Mohacsi
> Network Engineer, Research Associate, Head of Network Planning and Projec=
ts
> NIIF/HUNGARNET, HUNGARY
> Key 70EF9882: DEC2 C685 1ED4 C95A 145F  4300 6F64 7B00 70EF 9882
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Probably net/ucarp?

Cheers,
Denis Barov

--5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD)

iQCVAwUBRsrJHrQNqrxww2yeAQINYAP/fuXT9pGzjyXbIKBOd9STwsvn63L35f2g
UvY/LZ+4NNKGQUrE5umd/wXpLLftl2trgN5iLcM5Tb90anzfZdq8+5S1GrrAfOnt
e3R3ASMUbaa3fP1Q3N83JkIjv/2aI6F35pPooCGdF+POTu8QItkYqj0QJLvRqP42
U2z2R/1oVzo=
=KU/g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070821111438.GC1538>