Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:44:16 -0600 From: Hari Bhaskaran <subscr@spider.netmails.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openssl 0.9.6h checksum in ports Message-ID: <20030102114416.A74907@spider.netmails.net> In-Reply-To: <20030102112130.A74821@spider.netmails.net>; from subscr@spider.netmails.net on Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:21:30AM -0600 References: <20030102081330.A74175@spider.netmails.net> <1041521759.41889.12.camel@d80h149.public.uconn.edu> <20030102112130.A74821@spider.netmails.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
openssl.org just decided to re-release a release! It would have been much cleaner to bump up a version if they fix something! Come on, we are in 2003! http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=20021208.215539.34764527.levitte%40openssl.org On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 11:21:30AM -0600, Hari Bhaskaran wrote: > Funny the ftp directory in ftp.openssl.org/source > contains two sets of files. The checksum in ports > seem to match with the BOGUS one. > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 691 Dec 9 16:41 openssl-0.9.6h.BOGUS-0.9.6h.patch > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 2178290 Dec 5 23:25 openssl-0.9.6h.BOGUS.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 460 Dec 5 23:25 openssl-0.9.6h.BOGUS.tar.gz.asc > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 33 Dec 5 23:25 openssl-0.9.6h.BOGUS.tar.gz.md5 > -rw-rw-r-- 2 openssl openssl 2178314 Dec 8 20:43 openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 460 Dec 8 20:43 openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz.asc > -rw-rw-r-- 1 openssl openssl 33 Dec 8 20:43 openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz.md5 > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 10:35:59AM -0500, Matt Smith wrote: > > Confirmed -- Hari is not alone. > > > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:13, Hari Bhaskaran wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I just did a cvsup and updated the ports collection > > > and wanted to update the openssl. I see the makefile > > > was updated to 0.9.6h, but the checksum isn't. Unless > > > of course the openssl.org got yet another bad file. > > > > > > # make > > > >> openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > > > >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.openssl.org/source/. > > > Receiving openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz (2178314 bytes): 100% > > > 2178314 bytes transferred in 9.8 seconds (217.15 kBps) > > > ===> Extracting for openssl-0.9.6h > > > >> Checksum mismatch for openssl-0.9.6h.tar.gz. > > > Make sure the Makefile and distinfo file (/usr/ports/security/openssl/distinfo) > > > are up to date. If you are absolutely sure you want to override this > > > check, type "make NO_CHECKSUM=yes [other args]". > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/openssl. > > > > > > # ls -al > > > total 24 > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Jan 2 08:01 ./ > > > drwxr-xr-x 310 root wheel 6144 Jan 2 08:01 ../ > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 6272 Jan 2 08:01 Makefile > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 1754 Aug 30 02:02 Makefile.ssl > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 63 Jan 2 08:01 distinfo > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 2 08:01 files/ > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 23 Aug 15 1997 pkg-comment > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 812 Nov 20 2001 pkg-descr > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 110 Sep 17 1999 pkg-message > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root wheel 2171 Dec 24 12:55 pkg-plist > > > > > > Is this OK to upgrade openssl like this - since it is one > > > of those packages that is integrated to the core & all. > > > > > > -- > > > Hari Bhaskaran > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > -- > > Matt Smith <matt@forsetti.com> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030102114416.A74907>