Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Nov 1997 19:03:52 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        mike@smith.net.au (Mike Smith)
Cc:        tlambert@primenet.com, mike@smith.net.au, jamil@trojanhorse.ml.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BIOS information preservation (was Re: >64MB)
Message-ID:  <199711041903.MAA19517@usr06.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <199711040200.MAA00639@word.smith.net.au> from "Mike Smith" at Nov 4, 97 12:30:32 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Unfortunately, you need a Win32 (as you suggest) because there is a DLL
> > involved in reading the Word Format documents.
> 
> Is this DLL part of Win32, or part of WordPad?  If the former, how does 
> MS's stance on pushing the Win32 API onto *nix platforms impact its 
> potential availability?  (Actually, given that Willows can call Win32 
> native DLL's even from *nix-mode, this may be less of a problem than it 
> sounds.)

If you want to run Win95, you buy Win95.

If you want to run UNIX, you buy UNIX, then you buy Win95.

...at least, that's how I think it's "supposed" to work.  8-(.

If you look at the Winsock 2.0 SDK EULA, they've limited it to
Windows NT and Windows 95 *only*; this is a new thing for them;
I haven't seen this type of "attack license" from them before.
I suspect they may be feeling Linux, or trying to keep MacOS or
BeOS off balance.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711041903.MAA19517>