Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 17:58:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nm Message-ID: <199809081758.KAA01148@usr07.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.00.9809061153520.21019-100000@picnic.mat.net> from "Chuck Robey" at Sep 6, 98 12:01:18 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> As a suggestion, does it seem reasonable to have a wrapper for nm such > that it read ONLY the -elf or -aout flag, stripped it off, and then > dispatched either the nm-elf or nm-aout tool? That's dumb. Why would it use a flag instead of reading the magic number off the file? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809081758.KAA01148>