Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 00:56:40 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request for review [Re: /bin/ls patch round #2] Message-ID: <20010322005640.B20201@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200103212139.QAA22473@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 04:39:44PM -0500 References: <20010319195438.A43266@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320002043.A46115@peorth.iteration.net> <20010320065321.E63933668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <200103201736.MAA09185@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010321040241.C97FC3668@203.141.142.186.user.am.il24.net> <200103212119.QAA22140@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20010322002607.A19574@nagual.pp.ru> <200103212139.QAA22473@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 16:39:44 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > the way we code the standard utilities. That doesn't mean we > shouldn't implement <wctype.h> et al, but it does mean that we should > use whichever facilities are cleanest, and easiest to code for and > maintain, rather than those which are specifically blessed by an ISO > working group. In general wc*() functions provide more flexibility than runes, but in case we discuss there is no difference. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010322005640.B20201>