Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:44:33 +0900 (JST)
From:      "T.SHIOZAKI" <tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
To:        acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org, iwasaki@jp.freebsd.org
Cc:        msmith@freebsd.org, haro@tk.kubota.co.jp, takawata@shidahara1.planet.sci.kobe-u.ac.jp, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [acpi-jp 692] Re: ACPI megapatch
Message-ID:  <20000929.224433.15224078.tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20000929.224139.70178011.tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
References:  <200009290916.e8T9GmA04415@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <20000929220517P.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20000929.224139.70178011.tshiozak@astec.co.jp>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

From: "T.SHIOZAKI" <tshiozak@astec.co.jp>
Subject: [acpi-jp 692] Re: ACPI megapatch
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 22:41:39 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <20000929.224139.70178011.tshiozak@astec.co.jp>

> IMHO, it's desirable to use the name "acpi.h", because of conflict

Sorry, "it's desirable to avoid using ...".


--
Takuya SHIOZAKI



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000929.224433.15224078.tshiozak>