Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Jun 2014 15:52:12 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Cc:        svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r267107 - stable/10/sys/i386/conf
Message-ID:  <4F65442A-DAF8-4C76-A5A5-802C3EF51769@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20140607214835.GH679@alchemy.franken.de>
References:  <201406051308.s55D88mM053472@svn.freebsd.org> <652C13FA-F367-4884-BF65-2692E7614F93@gmail.com> <20140607214835.GH679@alchemy.franken.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_A14F6696-FF56-4BE1-8FB5-BE6FEE5060DF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Jun 7, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> =
wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:23:47AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
>> Why? There should be no -gdwarf-2 in the tree, that was a workaround =
that has since been obsoleted by (a) -g automatically changes to this in =
the makefile system and (b) the default was reverted back to dwarf 2. =
This wasn?t a mismerge, but an intentional fix.
>=20
> Because despite what you say, -gdwarf-2 actually still is in stable/9 =
and
> stable/10 as of now:
> marius@alchemy:/home/marius/co > grep -l -- -gdwarf-2 =
{9,10}/src/sys/*/conf/*
> 9/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> 9/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
> 9/src/sys/i386/conf/XEN
> 9/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC
> 10/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> 10/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC
> 10/src/sys/i386/conf/XEN
> 10/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC
>=20
> And also because replacing -gdwarf-2 with -g just wasn't part of =
r266820,
> doing the former when MFCing that revision as r267049 simply was a =
mismerge
> on my part.
> Apart from these I'm fully aware that -gdwarf-2 was/is only transient, =
but
> we're just not fully back to -g, yet.

Oh, yea, the MFC issue=85.  Yea, you=92re right. That mess hasn=92t been =
sorted out yet :( I=92ll sort 10 out this weekend and 9 out after 9.3, =
per the RE=92s request.

Warner

--Apple-Mail=_A14F6696-FF56-4BE1-8FB5-BE6FEE5060DF
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org
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=QO7C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_A14F6696-FF56-4BE1-8FB5-BE6FEE5060DF--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F65442A-DAF8-4C76-A5A5-802C3EF51769>