Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 15:21:39 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>, Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>, multimedia@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linuxolator v4l2/dvb patches (like for webcamd + skype...) Message-ID: <20110416132139.GA61818@triton8.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20110416113237.000035c9@unknown> References: <4DA4A1AC.90601@yandex.ru> <20110412222945.39b7a47b@ukr.net> <4DA4ADC7.6020101@yandex.ru> <20110412230426.550e8155@ukr.net> <20110413170446.GA84392@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <4DA5E0DB.2020009@FreeBSD.org> <20110413182157.GA87724@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <4DA72B26.7010009@FreeBSD.org> <20110415174620.GA31480@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <20110416113237.000035c9@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:32:37AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:46:20 +0200 Juergen Lock > <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:13:10PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > > BTW, just in case: > > > http://www.quickcamteam.net/documentation/faq/logitech-webcam-linux-usb-incompatibilities > > > > > > P.S. > > > http://blogs.skype.com/linux/2011/04/2_2_beta.html > > > > Ok I just tested that version and found another bug in the patches, > > but even after fixing that I couldn't get video to work with my > > gspca camera that doesn't do yuv video. :( Maybe the f10 version > > of libv4l that is now in ports is just too old? (Does anyone else > > get that version to work with a cam that does do yuv like a uvc?) > > > > netchild, you said you have an f10 build env iirc, could you try > > building the latest libv4l on there for me to test? > > Can you give me please some URLs? One where to download the > source, and one of the spec file (and patches if any). > Looks like libv4l now is part of v4l-utils: http://freshmeat.net/projects/libv4l http://linuxtv.org/downloads/v4l-utils/v4l-utils-0.8.3.tar.bz2 f14 has a bit older source rpm: (libv4l.spec inside) http://ftp.tu-chemnitz.de/pub/linux/fedora/linux/releases/14/Everything/source/SRPMS/libv4l-0.8.1-1.fc14.src.rpm and I found a newer one too: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jwrdegoede/v4l-utils-0.8.3-2.fc15.src.rpm > > > I have now split the dvb handling into a seperate kld because of > > the LGPL'd header it uses (linux_dvbwrapper.ko), but it looks like > > I'll have to make that a port as netchild still had concerns putting > > that version in base... > > It's more a "I do not want to be the one to put LGPLed stuff into a > kernel module", even if the common believe is that such a LGPLed > header does make the rest derived code / tainted. Currently I do not > intend to spend the time which is necessary to explain the issues to > core@ and discuss it with them. If someone else is willing to spend > time for this and if core@ tells me they are ok with this header > entering the src/sys tree, I shut up and commit it. OK. I guess not that many ppl will need this kld and those that do should be able to install it from ports then too, I just wanted to keep things a little easier but oh well, it's not _that_ important. Cheers, Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110416132139.GA61818>