Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 2 Mar 2014 09:30:07 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: A unified imx6 kernel config, old WANDBOARD-* configs going away
Message-ID:  <9BF14340-2267-473E-B047-E377AA258713@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <1393731762.1149.233.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References:  <1393594966.1149.161.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <F38D0A2F-D2AF-426D-8515-BD111501B2A2@kientzle.com> <CAB3ij4Dd1jq-_v7LVZ75skA3tZVOb=03vJ5JkSCb-7FL8FMrLg@mail.gmail.com> <1393731762.1149.233.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 1, 2014, at 8:42 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 2014-03-01 at 18:01 -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
>> I'm looking at the crochet code, and I see in freebsd_install_fdt =
that both
>> *.dtb and *.dts are supported. However on the source tree it's =
imx6.dtsi.
>> What's the difference b/t a dts file and a dtsi file?
>=20
> A .dtsi file is an include file used by .dts files.  A .dtb is the
> binary (compiled) form used by the kernel.
>=20
> So there are several wandboard-something.dts files, each of which
> includes imx6.dtsi where all the common parts live.  For a new imx6
> device, a new board-named file similar to one of the wandboard files =
is
> necessary, and it would also include imx6.dtsi.

As would other boards that use the imx6 SoC. They=92d have their own =
.dts
file that included the imx6.dsti and customized it for how they are =
wired
together.

> We're pushing hard towards just using the standard dtb files from
> vendors, but we've got a bit of work to do before we're there.

I have some rough changes that allow us to build N different DTBs as =
part
of the kernel build, but not glom them into the kernel. Not strictly =
required
for this, but helpful.

I=92m planning on having Atmel use 100% vendor supplied files as well.
It is a very good goal. There=92s also efforts on the linux side to =
separate out
the device-trees from the linux kernel, which is where I grabbed the =
recent
/vendor/device-tree stuff from.

Warner




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9BF14340-2267-473E-B047-E377AA258713>