Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 11:16:07 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brandelf and LINUXBASE/usr/libexec Message-ID: <20111213091607.GV50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <x5a6dl7xld6y6iu9yc912ea7.1323722423572@email.android.com> References: <x5a6dl7xld6y6iu9yc912ea7.1323722423572@email.android.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--AhX4GW6FRfN+WW5s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, >=20 > the issue (reboots on program execution) with unbranded static linux bina= ries is resolved in all supported branches? >=20 The static linux binaries built with the modern binutils are implicitely branded. > Bye, > Alexander. >=20 > --=20 > Send via an Android device, please forgive brevity and typographic and sp= elling errors.=9AKostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> hat geschrieben:On S= un, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:12:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > Hi List, > >=20 > > linux ports install some linux ELF binaries at LINUXBASE/usr/libexec. > > Should those files be branded to linux? > I do not think any files should branded (in the sense of brandelf(1)) > for any supported FreeBSD release and Linux binary built with > relatively modern Linux toolchain. --AhX4GW6FRfN+WW5s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7nF9YACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4g8sACfUdlbsvbOIFjFejVVXrs0HthP HG8AoJJTKPopS40hT813J8kFiR0Gy8Vt =/joG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhX4GW6FRfN+WW5s--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111213091607.GV50300>