Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:49:05 +0300
From:      c0re <nr1c0re@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: openssl version - how to verify
Message-ID:  <AANLkTi=ZqOiAmEyS=1A-SXy85SThb72fETBY4n=Y9FSJ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiknhXR9kpfMLD56ra5s9ihT93Vi4pmnyr-xLM1G@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <AANLkTinFoAC=t6-cp7ofphi=X%2BbGwkY-CL3X6B_ChTXH@mail.gmail.com> <20101115090851.237f167b@scorpio> <AANLkTinNd0mzR6x3fnB8xWFqJhX61mv3_EipUwaha6ux@mail.gmail.com> <20101115122428.294dde4f@scorpio> <AANLkTik7fLcRFoM6H4uohexXBVchKHxv4bSgiufTX-dp@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTiknhXR9kpfMLD56ra5s9ihT93Vi4pmnyr-xLM1G@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/11/16 Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:28 AM, c0re <nr1c0re@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jerry, I'm not about that :) base openssl are OK. But I need proves
>> that it has got no security problems - it's external IT auditors
>> request.
>> And I'm interested how I can know what patchlevel there on base
>> openssl version and prove them (auditors) that freebsd base openssl
>> are not vulnerable.
>
> Please don't top-post, thanks.

Sorry. Wont will in future. But why?

> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/
>
> The files say which version it's corrected in.
>
> --
> Adam Vande More
>

Thanks, it's better then nothing :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=ZqOiAmEyS=1A-SXy85SThb72fETBY4n=Y9FSJ>