Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:07:00 -0500 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: John Merryweather Cooper <john_m_cooper@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up Message-ID: <1080758898.889.22.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <1080757743.669.24.camel@localhost> References: <200403310656.i2V6uS7p029577@ns1.mezzweb.com> <1080731748.648.12.camel@localhost> <c4ees2$juu$1@sea.gmane.org> <1080739187.73073.28.camel@hood.oook.cz> <20040331132554.GC84869@voodoo.oberon.net> <1080755962.889.13.camel@gyros> <1080756364.669.19.camel@localhost> <1080757219.889.16.camel@gyros> <1080757743.669.24.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-lnJeUfHMm1Lu50EzbVNp Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:29, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 10:20, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 13:06, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:59, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 12:56, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 15:25:54 +0200, Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeB= SD.org>=20 > > > > > wrote: > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:19:47PM +0200, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > > >> With www/peacock maintainer's hat on: > > > > > >> > > > > > >> OMG why?? > > > > > > > > > > > > Because these *are* editors, doesn't matter what formats they > > > > > > can edit. The main purpose of this software is to edit > > > > > > something. > > > > >=20 > > > > > I second! > > > >=20 > > > > I third. Their primary purpose is an editor. They should be > > > > cross-referenced to www. That way, all the indexing tools will sti= ll > > > > show them in both categories. > > > >=20 > > > > Joe > > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Well, once you've got a committer on your side, I'm going to lose, bu= t I > > > think the organization structure of the tree needs some serious > > > consideration if we're heading in this direction. > >=20 > > My opinion certainly isn't law. I agree that the tree does need some > > work, and probably some dedicated resources to do cataloging. Portmgr > > is working on a new tree layout, so it's probably good to leave things > > where they are for now. However, if I was adding an HTML editor, my > > first thought would be, "editors." > >=20 > > Joe >=20 > Making this a more useful thread, our we headed toward a taxonomy that's > more functionally oriented or more descriptively oriented? Whichever > direction we're headed, what are the guidelines--stated clearly enough > so a new port author can traverse the guidelines and come up with a > placement--that are proposed? I'd rather not comment at this time. Once we have something definitive, we will make a public announcement, and all the instructions, and documentation will be in place. Joe >=20 > jmc --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-lnJeUfHMm1Lu50EzbVNp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAaxJyb2iPiv4Uz4cRAs5lAJ4uNJhSSTLyTFn3NiDlRDHr3016iwCcDstK pAE+4g6zJuRwOsDJ0OQgq/A= =IG6b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lnJeUfHMm1Lu50EzbVNp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1080758898.889.22.camel>