Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:36:28 +0400 From: "Sergey Mokryshev" <mokr@mokr.net> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: <cjclark@alum.mit.edu>, <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: question about ipl.ko Message-ID: <0b8901c24939$717d0f20$0f0010ac@office.tersys.ru> References: <20020816130147.GA39907@studnet.sk> <20020816193854.GC47465@blossom.cjclark.org> <062201c2475f$9f19ab40$0f0010ac@office.tersys.ru> <20020820181519.GA69240@blossom.cjclark.org> <0ab501c2492d$bc90fe10$0f0010ac@office.tersys.ru> <20020821162631.GA38043@leviathan.inethouston.net> <0b6601c24934$9dcf97f0$0f0010ac@office.tersys.ru> <20020821170743.GC38043@leviathan.inethouston.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, David! You wrote to "Sergey Mokryshev" <mokr@mokr.net> on Wed, 21 Aug 2002 12:07:43 -0500: >> No, ipl.ko is not broken. It depends on pfil(9). DWC> Shouldn't we try to make a pfil.ko that ipl.ko depends on then? I make a brief look into code (I am not a kernel hacker nor a programmer). There are a few files with PFIL_HOOKS-dependant #ifdefs, but it is strongly tied with the code. /sys/net/bridge.c /sys/netinet/ip_input.c /sys/netinet/ip_output.c /sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c /sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c /sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c Darren Reed has some pieces of code on his site, but I did not read it. ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/pub/net/ip-filter/pfil-1.26.tar.gz According to pfil(9) manual ----------- BUGS The current pfil implementation will need changes to suit a threaded ker- nel model. ----------- May be this is the reason not to make it default. Sincerely yours, Sergey Mokryshev. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0b8901c24939$717d0f20$0f0010ac>