Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:42:40 +0000 From: "hiren (hiren panchasara)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1711: Changes to the callout code to restore active semantics and also add a test-framework and test to validate thecallout code (and potentially for use by other tests). Message-ID: <37a9fb336d54797069f76edf2801927d@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org> References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-vhk6ww63dvpj6egspuyt-req@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hiren added a comment. >>! In D1711#60, @hiren wrote: >>>! In D1711#58, @rrs wrote: > >> hiren: >> >> This looks interesting to me, it is definitely something I would like to look at. I assume you >> are on 10.stable like Sean? > > Yes, its plain stable10+D1711. > Also, all 3 panics are from the same system. >>! In D1711#62, @hiren wrote: >>>! In D1711#59, @rrs wrote: >> Hiren: >> >> Ok looking at kern_timeout.c thats a call to >> class->lc_lock(c_lock, lock_status); >> >> If my 10.x matches yours. > > It's not :-( > > Looks like what we have here is not stock stable10 really. I'll check all the details and get back first thing in the morning tomorrow. > > Thanks for checking and sorry for the trouble. My bad. So yes, these machines are indeed stable10+D1711. I'll follow up separately on original comment. REVISION DETAIL https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1711 To: rrs, gnn, rwatson, lstewart, jhb, kostikbel, hselasky, adrian, imp, sbruno Cc: hiren, jhb, kostikbel, emaste, delphij, neel, erj, freebsd-net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37a9fb336d54797069f76edf2801927d>