Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:51:14 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync or git backups? Message-ID: <20160603095114.403943a7ec82c83472130af1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <CAKoxK%2B5onTFoVLFaGBSu2XCexZEueHMxnGSNCGdEnj4Czydt9Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAKoxK%2B4MuSFi7ctcAXVzZ61mXzCsnP-qsWxEOTor_T1SFgc-cg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKE2PDs6eey-Cp0ZCai=Sbd13aOXx=44RTKafos0K4p34MutxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKoxK%2B5onTFoVLFaGBSu2XCexZEueHMxnGSNCGdEnj4Czydt9Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:19:09 +0200 Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:49 PM, jungle Boogie <jungleboogie0@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 1 June 2016 at 01:35, Luca Ferrari <fluca1978@infinito.it> wrote: > >> > >> Any suggestion? > > > > > > Obviously the first choice is zfs snapshots but if you're like me, > > that's not a choice. > > > > I'd recommend something like borg backup: > > https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/ > > http://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > > Thanks to all. > Effectively ZFS is a kind of too much for my poor USB disks, also > because I would like to have them a little more portable than ZFS will > give me (I'm not aware of any commercial media center able to read > from a ZFS storage). > I will give a try to rsnapshot and borg. One thought for you - perhaps keep the master copy under ZFS for snapshots and corruption protection and use rsnapshot or borg to copy to more portable copies for use. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160603095114.403943a7ec82c83472130af1>