Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:57:53 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
Cc:        freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Specifying MTREE_FILE in couple of freebsd-gnome maintained ports
Message-ID:  <1109923073.28799.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200503040850.38524.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
References:  <200503040850.38524.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-gwSAzMEIRuZ+PtzH5jVs
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 08:50 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote:
> Quite some time ago, the following snippets were added to several=20
> freebsd-gnome maintained ports to use proper mtree file:
>=20
> .if ${X_WINDOW_SYSTEM:L} =3D=3D xfree86-3
> MTREE_FILE=3D     /etc/mtree/BSD.x11.dist
> .else
> MTREE_FILE=3D     /etc/mtree/BSD.x11-4.dist
> .endif
>=20
> As it seems, this had to be done because these ports couldn't use USE_X_P=
REFIX=20
> (as it implies X libraries dependency), but do use PREFIX =3D ${X11BASE}.
> In rev. 1.503 of bsd.port.mk the decide-what-mtree-file-to-use logic was=20
> modified to check for ${PREFIX} =3D=3D ${X11BASE} case, which seems to ma=
ke this=20
> snippet in ports obsolete.
> And now to the reason I'm nagging about this: the X.Org update includes s=
ome=20
> cleanups to mtree. To work around the plist errors that would result by i=
t a=20
> temporary mtree file would be added to ports and bsd.port.mk modified to =
take=20
> that one instead of BSD.x11-4.dist. These ports would either have to be=20
> modified, but as it seems this MTREE_FILE specification is now redundant,=
 it=20
> can rather be removed alltogether.
> The ports that have this:
>=20
> lang/librep
> textproc/scrollkeeper
> x11-fonts/bitstream-vera
> x11-fonts/fontconfig
>=20
> So, what do you guys think?

This was brought up a while ago on IRC, and I had forgotten about the
bsd.port.mk change (even though I added it to MarcusCom).  In any event,
it was vestigial, and I was lazy at the time.  I'll go ahead and do this
now.

Joe

> I can send you a patch for this if you need one.
>=20
>=20
> Dejan
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20
--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-gwSAzMEIRuZ+PtzH5jVs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCKBUBb2iPiv4Uz4cRAnlpAKCR3sO86V/I18ifB/cvsxia9HjxHgCfRjtq
8ZIzDM0Q+4BQW/9lBhgVLUI=
=6dtg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-gwSAzMEIRuZ+PtzH5jVs--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1109923073.28799.18.camel>