Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2006 16:51:05 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/awstats - roll back to 6.5. Why? Message-ID: <m3y7w3pwyu.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <448B21DA.8000602@FreeBSD.org> (Doug Barton's message of "Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:47:38 -0700") References: <20060607111916.3550ef41@apircalabu.dsd.ro> <m31wu1b4ln.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20060607141511.GO17817@mich2.itxmarket.com> <m3pshhxrju.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <448B21DA.8000602@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> writes: > Matthias Andree wrote: > >> The PORTEPOCH hadn't propagated when I'd run "portsnap fetch update" and >> checked a minute before I posted my reminder. > > If you're going to be issuing reminders about things, you should check > cvsweb first. Well, it was more of a regular reminder anyways. The acutal issue was rectified anyways. However, I wonder if the CVS master repo should run a precommit check that versions aren't going backwards (it can do that). It sure won't be foolproof, and it needn't, but it will catch the common cases, and this thread showed that in fact people (end users) picked up an upgrade where the version went backwards again. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3y7w3pwyu.fsf>