Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:10:23 -0500 From: Mike Horwath <drechsau@Geeks.ORG> To: Danial Thom <danial_thom@yahoo.com> Cc: performance@freebsd.org, Kip Macy <kmacy@fsmware.com>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x (was: e: [fbsd] HEADS UP: FreeBSD 5.3, 5.4, 6.0 EoLs coming soon) Message-ID: <20061015151023.GE98831@Geeks.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20061015145732.82798.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20061012105249.P77744@demos.bsdclusters.com> <20061015145732.82798.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote: > Hi Kip, > > Where you a troll when you outlined how your port > of FreeBSD 6 to Solaris was so bad that it was > virtually unusable? Stating facts is not > trolling. And you crossposted this to performance...why? Kip might be right, you could be a troll. I am not on freebsd-stable. And I do miss Mr. Dillon but I don't think he needs your support, unless you are going to run DragonFly BSD - which I kind of doubt you are since it isn't 64bit and does not fit your latest must be greated mentality. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061015151023.GE98831>