Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 16:56:07 +0100 From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microsoft performance (was: ...) Message-ID: <E10xBrD-0000S5-00@fanf.noc.demon.net> In-Reply-To: <37724324.E984AFD@softweyr.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.95.990623213838.993R-100000@current1.whistle.com> <3771CBA7.4973C681@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> wrote: > >Sorry to follow up on my own message, but I noted today in PCWeek >their trip back to the benchmark lab includes ripping 3 CPUs and >768M RAM out of the system, to benchmark how Linux and NT perform >on "lower-end" hardware. They also allowed the RedHat dudes to >switch to an Adaptec SCSI controller to talk to the RAID array. >How are we holding up under this "diminished" configuration? It's stupid to tune everything for performance except for the web server -- they should be using Zeus, not Apache. Tony. -- f.a.n.finch dot@dotat.at fanf@demon.net Winner, International Obfuscated C Code Competition 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E10xBrD-0000S5-00>