Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 22:35:15 +0200 From: Marc "UBM" Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status of ZFS in -stable? Message-ID: <20080514223515.84553317.ubm@u-boot-man.de> In-Reply-To: <48291889.8030406@pldrouin.net> References: <48291889.8030406@pldrouin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 13 May 2008 00:26:49 -0400 Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net> wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to know if the memory allocation problem with zfs has > been fixed in -stable? Is zfs considered to be more "stable" now? > > Thanks! > Pierre-Luc Drouin We just set up a zfs based fileserver in our home. It's accessed via samba and ftp, connected via an em 1gb card. FreeBSD is installed on an 80GB ufs2 disk, the zpool consists of two 750GB disks, set up as raidz (my mistake, mirror would probably have been the better choice). We've been using it for about 2 weeks now and there have been no problems (transferred lots of big and small files off/on it, maxing out disk speed). System is amd64, 4gb of ram. FreeBSD blah 7.0-STABLE-200804 FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE-200804 #0: Thu Apr 10 16:32:11 UTC 2008 root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Bye Marc -- "A sudden blow: the great wings beating still Above the staggering girl, her thighs caressed By the dark webs, her nape caught in his bill, He holds her helpless breast upon his breast." W.B. Yeats, Leda and the Swan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080514223515.84553317.ubm>